Do you agree with Miller's analysis of Bush's speech?I'm just curious.?

Mark Crispin Miller in¨ The Bush Dislexicon¨ observed that all of Bush's fatally stupid remarks and grammatical errors usually occur when he's faking it; faking interest in the matter at hand or faking a concern that he doesn't feel.On the other hand,when he talks about punishing people and getting back at them,his speech patterns change and his syntax and grammar are almost those of someone who actually finished school.





¨I know how difficult it is to put food in your families¨


(Lack of any real concern;he's faking it)





¨We are grateful to the brave Austrian troops...¨


(lack of interest;he couldn't care less what country they're from)





In his famous speech in N.O. ,after Katrine,his discourse makes grammatical sense and he gets his act together when he threatens lawbreakers,including desperate people trying to get into abandoned tents for bottled water that government agencies are failing to distribute!





Has anybody noticed this too? Do you think M.C. Miller is correct?

Do you agree with Miller's analysis of Bush's speech?I'm just curious.?
Well it makes perfect sense. Bush is no statesman and apparently he's no public speaker either. I wish I could find this comforting, but the fact is, Bush inspires not confidence, but fear.





The things Bush is bad at, or incapable of doing, is growing by the hour. Pretty soon even the most brain dead voter in this nation will wonder why he or she voted for such "Low Leadership".
Reply:Who made Miller the authority? What are his credentials? Since you did not provide any sources, all I am able to surmise is this Miller is another Bush Basher. I don't believe his theories for one minute. I am certain however, the presidency is a very difficult and stressful position. He has the lives of everyone in this nation to consider.





I would not be surprised to learn that he gets little sleep and works hard. I believe his good deeds take precedence over the fact htat he gets a little nervous making speeches. He may feel that the time it take to make these speeches he could be accomplishing more by doing than talking.
Reply:no I don't really agree with that
Reply:No! Miller is as whacked as Moore, he has no credibility, the only ones that listen to him are those conspiracy nuts...

apricot